The U.S. Supreme Court turned away a Toyota Motor Corp. appeal that sought to force arbitration of California lawsuits over the brakes in Prius cars.
The justices today left intact a federal appeals court decision that said Toyota couldn’t enforce the arbitration clauses in its dealers’ purchase agreements with customers.
The consumers say the anti-lock brake system in the model- year 2010 Priuses had a defect that made the cars harder to stop, particularly on rough surfaces. The consumers, who don’t allege they were injured, say Toyota failed to resolve the problem in a 2010 recall. They urged the Supreme Court not to hear the appeal.
The case is Toyota Motor v. Choi, 12-1230.
Copyright 2026 Bloomberg.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Navigators Can’t Parse ‘Additional Insured’ Policy Wording in Georgia Explosion Case
Elon Musk Alone Can’t Explain Tesla’s Owner Exodus
Berkshire Utility Presses Wildfire Appeal With Billions at Stake
Why 2026 Is The Tipping Point for The Evolving Role of AI in Law and Claims