Articles by Steven Plitt

image of Steven PlittSteven Plitt is the current successor author to Couch on Insurance, 3d. He maintains a national coverage practice with The Cavanagh Law Firm. He has been listed continuously as one of Arizona's 50 lawyers by Southwest Super Lawyers. He can be reached splitt@cavanaghlaw.com. To read additional articles by Steven Plitt, go to www.insuranceexpertplitt.com.

S.C. Court Rules “Your Work” Exclusion Applies to Costs to Remove and Rebuild Brick Wall to Meet Contract Compliance

Recently, the South Carolina Court of Appeals in Precision Walls, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 410 S.C. 175, 763 S.E.2d 598 (Ct. App. 2014), reh’g denied (Oct. 23, 2014), held that the cost to tear down and re-build …

Arkansas Faulty Workmanship Statute Does Not Have Retroactive Application

The Arkansas Legislature enacted ARK. CODE ANN. § 23-79-155 in 2011. This statute provides in relevant part CGL policies are required to contain a definition of “occurrence” that included “[p]roperty damage … resulting from faulty workmanship.” § 23-79-155(a)(2). Recently, the …

Florida Appeals Court Provides Guidance on When an Insured’s Bad Faith Lawsuit is Ripe

In Florida, insureds can bring civil lawsuits against insurance companies when the insured is damaged by the insurance company’s not attempting to settle claims in good faith when all of the circumstances indicate the insurer could and should have done …

Choosing Your Punishment May Foreclose UM (UIM) Coverage

Insureds who settle a claim with the tortfeasor’s liability insurer for less than the stated limit of the policy may not satisfy the exhaustion requirement for recovering UIM benefits (or UM benefits where the policy defines a UM vehicle in …

Public Policy Prevents Family Step-Down Clauses in South Carolina Auto Policies

There is a wide divergence of authority regarding the enforceability of family member step -down clauses in automobile liability policies. Automobile liability step down clauses reduce coverage for bodily injury to family members from the stated policy coverage reflected on …

Louisiana’s Direct Action Statute Doesn’t Substantively Modify Claims-Made Policy Notice Provisions

Typical claims-made insurance policies require claims to be both made and reported within the applicable policy period. Under this type of policy, the risk of a claim incurred but not made, as well as a claim made but not reported, …

Demanding Arbitration is No Excuse for Bad Faith Conduct

An interesting case recently came before the California Court of Appeals involving an insured’s uninsured motorist (UM) demand for policy limits and the insurer’s response demanding arbitration. In Maslo v. Ameriprise Auto & Home Ins., 227 Cal.App.4th 626 (2nd Dist. …

The Pitfalls of Rejecting a Defense Under Texas ‘Same Facts’ Test

Texas law recognizes that an insurer’s reservation of rights can create a potential conflict of interest. Northern County Mut. Ins. Co. v. Davalos, 140 S.W.3d 685 (Tex. 2004). Although there is a potential for conflict in this situation, the assertion …

Known Claim Exclusion Trumps Common-Law Known Loss Doctrine

The known loss doctrine is a common-law concept deriving from the fundamental requirement in insurance law that the loss be fortuitous. General Housewares Corp. v. National Surety Corp., 741 N.E.2d 408, 416 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000) (citing Pittston Co., Ultramar …

Conspiracy to Abduct Not Covered

Custody battles oftentimes give rise to insurance coverage questions. A common scenario that arises in domestic dispute situations involves one spouse abducting their child or children from the other spouse who has custody. When there is ensuing civil litigation the …