New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice Director Vaughn McKoy announced that a Perth Amboy man has been ordered to pay a New Jersey insurance company $15,000 in restitution for his participation in an automobile insurance “give up” scheme.
According to Insurance Fraud Prosecutor Greta Gooden-Brown, Francisco J. Caba, 36, of Perth Amboy, Middlesex County, was sentenced on Oct. 29 by Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Frederick DeVesa to pay $15,000 in restitution and to serve five years probation after pleading guilty to charges contained in a Middlesex County Grand Jury indictment filed by the Division of Criminal Justice -Office of Insurance Fraud Prosecutor.
In pleading guilty on July 30, Caba reportedly admitted that he, along with co-defendant Geuris Valdez-Fernandez, 35, of Perth Amboy, Middlesex County, submitted a phony automobile insurance theft claim to The Newark Insurance Company – Robert Plan of New Jersey Corporation.
The Division of Criminal Justice – Office of Insurance Fraud Prosecutor investigation determined that Caba took Valdez-Fernandez’s 1998 Toyota Camry, reported the car stolen to the NYPD, and submitted a phony automobile theft claim to The Newark Insurance Company. Newark Insurance Company paid $14,234 to Toyota Financial Services, the company that financed Valdez-Fernandez’ car loan, as a result of the fraudulent claim. The investigation determined that Caba, as part of the conspiracy, turned the car over a third individual who was working undercover for investigators from the Office of the Insurance Fraud Prosecutor.
On Sept. 26, 2002, Valdez-Fernandez was charged in connecting with this automobile insurance “give-up” conspiracy. He pleaded guilty and was entered into the Pre-trial Intervention (PTI) Program on March 14, 2003.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Why 2026 Is The Tipping Point for The Evolving Role of AI in Law and Claims
These Five Technologies Increase The Risk of Cyber Claims
Founder of Auto Parts Maker Charged With Fraud That Wiped Out Billions
Navigators Can’t Parse ‘Additional Insured’ Policy Wording in Georgia Explosion Case