A federal judge must decide whether a jury can hear evidence that a now-retired Pennsylvania judge went inline skating after collecting $440,000 in insurance claims for neck and back injuries in a car accident.
Prosecutors say the September 2002 skating incident proves then-Superior Court Judge Michael Joyce wasn’t injured as badly as he claimed in the crash of August 2001.
But Joyce’s attorneys say the evidence is prejudicial and irrelevant.
Senior U.S. District Judge Maurice Cohill must decide whether to allow that evidence and other testimony before Joyce’s insurance fraud trial begins Oct. 20 in Pittsburgh.
Source: Erie Times-News.
Copyright 2026 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
LA County Told to Pause $4B in Abuse Payouts as DA Probes Fraud Claims
Canceled FEMA Review Council Vote Leaves Flood Insurance Reforms in Limbo
Uber Jury Awards $8.5 Million Damages in Sexual Assault Case
Why 2026 Is The Tipping Point for The Evolving Role of AI in Law and Claims