The U.S. Supreme Court rejected an appeal from Hurricane Katrina victims seeking billions of dollars on claims that the Army Corps of Engineers added to the storm’s impact by improperly maintaining a shipping channel.
The justices today left intact a federal appeals court decision that said the Federal Tort Claims Act shields the U.S. government from lawsuits. The lower-court ruling came in test cases designed to resolve many of the hundreds of Katrina- related suits against the federal government.
Units of Entergy Corp., a New Orleans-based energy company, were among those urging a high-court review. Entergy says it sustained $1.3 billion in damage from the 2005 hurricane.
A federal trial judge found “monumental negligence” by the Army Corps in allowing erosion to widen the channel to three times its design width over the course of decades. The judge said the widened channel exacerbated the effect of the Katrina storm surge, helping cause the breach of a levee and the flooding of New Orleans’s Lower Ninth Ward and St. Bernard Parish.
The case is Lattimore v. United States, 12-1092.
(Editors: Laurie Asseo, Mark McQuillan)
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Credit Suisse Nazi Probe Reveals Fresh SS Ties, Senator Says
US Will Test Infant Formula to See If Botulism Is Wider Risk
Canceled FEMA Review Council Vote Leaves Flood Insurance Reforms in Limbo
Why 2026 Is The Tipping Point for The Evolving Role of AI in Law and Claims