New York’s top court has rejected a product liability claim against tobacco companies for selling regular cigarettes when they could have used lower levels of tar and nicotine.
The Court of Appeals ruled that lawyers representing the late Norma Rose, who died after smoking regular cigarettes for more than 40 years, failed to prove that “light” cigarettes have the same effects as regulars.
The judges, upholding a midlevel court, say the only “utility” of a cigarette is to gratify a smoker’s desire for a certain experience, and it was unproven that light cigarettes do that as well as regular cigarettes.
The suit named Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Philip Morris USA and other companies.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Berkshire Utility Presses Wildfire Appeal With Billions at Stake
These Five Technologies Increase The Risk of Cyber Claims
Why 2026 Is The Tipping Point for The Evolving Role of AI in Law and Claims
LA County Told to Pause $4B in Abuse Payouts as DA Probes Fraud Claims