An attorney for supporters of an initiative petition to place storm shelters in public schools told the Oklahoma Supreme Court that Attorney General Scott Pruitt’s office abused its discretion by re-writing a ballot title that he says was not legally incorrect.
The state’s highest court heard oral arguments Tuesday from attorneys in the lawsuit over an initiative petition that asks voters to decide a $500 million bond issue to pay for school storm shelters.
David Slane, who represents supporters of the petition, says the attorney general’s ballot title overemphasizes the funding method and underemphasizes the purpose of the petition.
The lawsuit was filed in October by Take Shelter Oklahoma and Kristi Conatzer, the mother of one of seven children killed when a tornado struck a school in Moore last May.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Why 2026 Is The Tipping Point for The Evolving Role of AI in Law and Claims
Elon Musk Alone Can’t Explain Tesla’s Owner Exodus
FM Using AI to Elevate Claims to Deliver More Than Just Cost Savings
Charges Dropped Against ‘Poster Boy’ Contractor Accused of Insurance Fraud